Stretching vs. Foam Rolling: Which one is better?

Many fitness enthusiasts wonder whether static stretching or foam rolling is more effective for improving flexibility. Recent research provides insight into this question, revealing that while both methods enhance range of motion, one might offer quicker results.

Static stretching involves holding a stretch for 15-60 seconds, targeting specific muscles to improve flexibility. On the other hand, foam rolling, or self-myofascial release, uses a foam roller or similar object to apply pressure to muscles and fascia, promoting relaxation and range of motion.

Both techniques are effective, but they operate differently. Static stretching shows noticeable improvements in range of motion in less than four weeks. In contrast, foam rolling requires at least four weeks to deliver similar benefits.

If you’re seeking faster flexibility gains, static stretching is the way to go. However, consistent practice of either method will ultimately yield comparable results over time. Additionally, if neither stretching nor foam rolling appeals to you, research indicates that weight training can also enhance flexibility and range of motion.

In conclusion, whether you choose static stretching, foam rolling, or weight training, the key is consistency. Each approach can help you achieve your flexibility goals, so pick the one that best fits your routine and preferences.

George Patsali

IFBB Certified Nutritionist & Fitness Trainer

Former Taekwondo Professional Athlete (alm. 2 decades) that worked with the best nutritionists, dietitians and personal trainers in my athletic career.

I read and implement daily the best practices and share my knowledge and honest opinion on what works best, in order to grow with everyone and have a healthier, fitter community worldwide.

Previous
Previous

Can You Out-Train Sleep Deprivation? Here's What the Research Says

Next
Next

The Truth About Cardio and Muscle Gains